Kanchan Kumar @ Kanchan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64232 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== KANCHAN KUMAR @ KANCHAN KUMAR SINGH, son of late Kanhaiya Singh, resident of Village- Kaithi Dera, P.S. Bagan Gola, DistrictBuxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 18-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No.64 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 341, 323, 504, 325, 307, 498-A/34 Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the Court of the SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Buxar. Petitioner is husband of the informant.

The informant in the written report has alleged that she was married with this petitioner, who is working in Armed Forces. She was tortured in her Sasural for Bullet and golden chain. It is alleged that this petitioner on 18.01.2018 assaulted the informant by closing the door causing injury in her thigh,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64232 of 2018(3) dt.18-12-2018 2/2 waist, wrist, head etc. while she was pregnant. She was crying, but none of the family members came to save her. Injury report of the informant has been received separately from the SDJM, Buxar, wherein, doctor has found ten injuries on the person of the Informant. Injury No.9 was found to be grievous.

The petitioner is working in Armed Forces and he has committed such brutal act.

In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage. Prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and make all efforts to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Liberty is given to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months, if no substantive progress is made in the trial.

(Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T