Dipak Kumar Rai @ Dipak Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49547 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -145 Year- 2017 Thana -KISHUNPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== DIPAK KUMAR RAI @ DIPAK KUMAR RAM .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Ravi Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Amrendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Counsel for the petitioner and the State are present. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for offence under sections 394/411 IPC.
As per paragraph 3 of the bail petition, the petitioner has no antecedent and there is no eye witness to the occurrence. Investigation has been completed and charge sheet has also been submitted, as such, there is no chance to temper with the investigation. Similarly situated co-accused Rupesh Kumar Singh has already been allowed bail by a bench of this Court vide order dated 19.9.2017, passed in Cr.Misc.No. 44075/2017. In the facts of the case, the bail application is allowed. Let the petitioner as mentioned above be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in Kishunpur Police Station Case No. 145 of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49547 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 2017 on the following conditions:- (a) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with him. The bailor will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (b) The petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse.
(c) The petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.
U T