Mukti Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46062 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-439 Year-2024 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

Mukti Ram son of Late Ramkishun Ram Resident of Village-Sankherha, P.S.-Baheri, District-Darbhanga.

2.

Nilesh Ram @ Rilesh Ram son of Asarfi Ram Resident of VillageSankherha, P.S.-Baheri, District-Darbhanga. 3.

Asarfi Ram Son of Late Ramkishun Ram Resident of Village-Sankherha, P.S.-Baheri, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard Mr. Sushil Kumar Jha learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kumar learned APP for the State. 2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 439/2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others arrived at the door of the informant. It is alleged that Asarfi Ram, petitioner no. 03 knock down the informant and pulled her Saree. Mukti Ram, petitioner no. 01 assaulted with lathi and it is further alleged that all accused persons assaulted with lathi and iron rod.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46062 of 2025(2) dt.05-08-2025 2/2 committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is also a counter version of this case. It has also been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the injury is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. Lastly, he submits that a statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioners.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 439/2024, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Darbhanga subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) krishnakant/- U T