Vipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45717 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2025 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Vipin Kumar Son of Krishna Chaudhary Resident of Village- Mohiuddinpur, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada, ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Warisliganj P.S. Case No. 222 of 2025 dated 28.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a), 30(c), 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that the petitioner and the co-accused persons were indulged in the business of liquor and manufacturing the said liquor in the house of one Bhola Manjhi who migrated along with his family members for earning their livelihood . On raid, total 70 litres of illicit country made liquor, Bhatthi, liquor making machine, gas cylinder and stove were recovered from the house of the Bhola Manjhi and 2000 litres of Mahua Ghol was also destroyed at the place of occurrence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45717 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 16.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Nawada in connection with Warisliganj P.S. Case No. 222 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T