Santosh Paswan v. Nitu Devi And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.1193 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Santosh Paswan, Son of Bilash Paswan, Resident of Village-Alinagar, P.o.- Barbigha,P.S.-Sare, Distt.-Nalanda ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

Nitu Devi W/o Santosh Paswan, D/o Sadan Paswan Resident of VillageMohanpur Bansibigha,P.O.-Sarmera,P.S.-Sarmera,Distt.-Nalanda 2.

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sri Nand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 28-11-2022 No one appears for the petitioner.

In Criminal Revision No. 1233 of 2016, this Court has recorded as to how in the revision matters of the year 2016 which are related to the maintenance of neglected women and children, in 80 - 90% cases the Lawyers are not appearing and this Court has no assistance. This Court has noticed that under such circumstances instead of simply dismissing the revision application for default leaving room for petitioner to file restoration application after some time and then get it restored and in this manner prolong the hearing of the case, it would only be just and proper to go through the materials available on the record and dispose it of on it's own merit.

Proceeding on the same line, this Court has

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1193 of 2018(4) dt.28-11-2022 2/2 considered this revision application.

Earlier this case was called out on 07.09.2022, on the said date also no one appeared for the petitioner. Considering that the impugned order is an interim order against which a revision would not lie and the petitioner remains unrepresented once again, this application is dismissed. At the time of rising of the Court learned counsel for the petitioner has appeared and prayed for an adjournment. This Court has refused the same.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) tusharika/- U