Shivlok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52538 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2021 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ====================================================== SHIVLOK KUMAR SON OF RAJJAN SINGH @ RANJAN KUMAR SINGH @ RANJAN KUMAR @ RANJAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- SABNIMA, POLICE STATION- ATHAMALGOLA, DISTRICTPATNA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Braj Kishore Pd., APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 12-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 376(3) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the POCSO Act. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have threatened the minor daughter of the informant and established physical relations with her. Thereafter, he threatened that he would make the video of the occurrence viral. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. It is a case of love affair between the parties. No specific date of occurrence has been mentioned. The FIR has been registered after a delay of 12 days. No external or internal injury has been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52538 of 2021(4) dt.12-04-2022 2/2 found on the victim. The petitioner is in custody since 6.5.2021 and has no criminal antecedent.
Heard learned APP for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the materials on record together with the direct allegation against the petitioner who is said to have established physical relations with the daughter of the informant who has been found in the medical examination to be below 18 years, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Prakash/- U