Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47898/2024bail granted

Mangal Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-30Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47898 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2024 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== MANGAL SAHNI SON OF LATE LAKHAN SAHNI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - DALKAWA, POLICE STATION - SONBARSA, DISTRICT - SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024 dated 31.01.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant went to coaccused to tell him to turn off water as it was coming towards informant's house, the co-accused started abusing the informant and assaulted her, on seeing this the informant's husband and brother came to save the informant, upon which all the co-accused along with the petitioner started assaulting the informant's husband. In the meantime, the co-accused hit the informant's

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47898 of 2024(2) dt.30-07-2024 2/2 husband with an iron rod and the co-accused stabbed the informant's husband with knife.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 27.02.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T