Uday Yadav @ Uday Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46172 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2025 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Uday Yadav @ Uday Kumar S/O Surya Nath Yadav Resident of VillageKamlabari Belhi, P.S- Jainagar, District- Madhubani. 2.

Harish Chandra Yadav @ Harish Chandra Kumar S/O Surya Nath Yadav Resident of Village- Kamlabari Belhi, P.S- Jainagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 103(1), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per F.I.R., all the named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted the grand daughter of informant and strangulated her neck with saree as a result of which, she died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. From perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that there is general and omnibus allegation against petitioners. Though petitioners and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46172 of 2026(2) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 others were involved in altercation with Ghanshyam Yadav but as per F.I.R., it was co-accused Bandana Yadav, Ajit Yadav and Dipesh Yadav who closed the deceased in a room and hanged her with fan with the help of saree. Informant is not an eye witness of the occurrence and petitioners are not alleged to be assailants of the deceased. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, clean antecedent and the fact that petitioners are not the assailants of the deceased, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Kaluahi P. S. Case No. 193 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T