Bhulan Patel v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.53507 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -169 Year- 2017 Thana -AADAPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Bhulan Patel Son of Late Kishun Raut, Resident of Village-Laxmipur Pokhriya, P.S.-Adapur, District-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Adapur P.S.Case No.169 of 2017, G.R. Case No.744 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 307, 147, 148, 149,379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that later name of the petitioner has been mentioned in the re-statement of the wife of the informant but no specific allegation has been attributed against him. He is in custody since 31.8.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53507 of 2017 (3) dt.17-11-2017 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Raxaul East Champaran, Motihri in connection with Adapur P.S.Case No.169 of 2017. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T