Sita Ram Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.54006 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -512 Year- 2017 Thana -SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Sita Ram Manjhi Son of late Dev Nandan Manjhi R/o Village- Khap, P.S.- Kanahauli, District- Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Complaint Case No.C2 512 of 2017/771 of 2017 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 47 ltrs. of nepali liquor.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody for two months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54006 of 2017 (2) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-II-Special Judge Excise Act, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No.C2-512 of 2017/771 of 2017.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T