Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62445/2017bail granted

Chhitan Yadav @ Chhitan Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-07Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62445 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2017 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ====================================================== Chhitan Yadav @ Chhitan Rai Son of Ramadhar Yadav Resident of Village - Tranga @ Taresna @ Tarenga, P.S. - Bihta, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rana Baljit Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. S. Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 07-02-2018 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is an accused in a case registered for offence under section 302, 201/34 and 379 of the IPC. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on his own confessional statement. Similarly situated co-accused Khedan yadav has already been granted bail vide order dated 18.10.2017 passed in Cr Misc No.48675 of 2017. Prior to the lodging of this case, he is not accused in other case. Petitioner is in custody since 12.6.2017.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62445 of 2017 (3) dt.07-02-2018 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur Patna in Bihta Police Station Case No. 152 of 2017 on the following conditions:-

1. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

2. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offences till conclusion of the trial.

3. That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

4. The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.

U T