Yashwant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40913 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2018 Thana- SONBERSA DistrictSitamarhi ====================================================== YASHWANT KUMAR, aged about 25 years, male, Son of Ashok Paswan @ Ashok Kumar Paswan Resident of Village- Dhanushi, P.S.- Runnisaidpur, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Hans Lal Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in connection with Sonebarsa P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and this is the first such complaint of its nature since the parties were married in the year 2015. The petitioner expresses his readiness to keep the informant with due dignity and honour. Statement is made at the Bar that the petitioner has not solemnized any other marriage except with the informant. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40913 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 181 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T