Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43222/2022allowed

Sahjad Ansari @ Sajjad Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2024-01-15Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43222 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2021 Thana- VALMIKINAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Sahjad Ansari @ Sajjad Mian S/O Naeem Miyan @ Naim Miyan Resident Of Village- Phulwaria, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants looted the collected money of Rs. 1,59,267/- and mobile from the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43222 of 2022(4) dt.15-01-2024 2/2 statement of co-accused Rajan Chaudhary, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 07.03.2022.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Valmikinagar P.S. Case No. 48 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T