Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46104/2016rejected

Dwarika Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-17Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46104 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2016 Thana -RAMPUR CHAURAY District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Dwarika Singh,

2. Karu Yadav,

3. Panna Lal Yadav All sons of Sri Ramdev Yadav

4. Birendra Yadav Son of Sri Jainandan Yadav

5. Raju Yadav

6. Sonu Yadav Both are sons of Laldev Yadav and all are resident of Village- Alawalchak, P.S. Rampur Chauram District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Paras Nath, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2017 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Rampur Chauram P.S. Case No. 11 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307, 325 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleged that some quarrel took place between the children of Bindra Yadav and Pannalal Yadav and for that on 19.03.2016, the petitioners having armed with different weapons surrounded Bindra Yadav and assaulted him. The informant went to rescue but the accused persons also assaulted the informant. When Govindra Yadav and Ramanuj Kumar came

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46104 of 2016 (3) dt.17-01-2017 2/2 to save the accused persons also assaulted Govindra Yadav and Ramanuj Kumar.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is a counter version being Rampur Chauram P.S. Case No. 12 of 2016. The informant and others are alleged to have assaulted the informant Dwarika Singh and others. Three persons got injuries from the side of the petitioners, but it appears that from the side of the informant four persons are injured and the injury report of the informant, his brother Govindra Yadav and Ramanju Kumar show that they got grievous injury.

Considering the facts aforesaid, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners above named on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T