← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54371/2017bail granted

Sanoj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-11-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54371 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -134 Year- 2014 Thana -BELHAR District- BANKA ======================================================

1. Sanoj Kumar Yadav S/o Mohan Yadav, R/o Village- Rebatolla (Chiroutha), P.S.- Belhar, District- Banka.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ramchandra Sahani ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-11-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with B.P.No.642 of 2017 arising out of Belhar P.S.Case No.134/2014 registered for offences punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is not named in the FIR. He has been made accused in this case on the basis of confession. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except confession there is nothing against the petitioner, no recovery and he is in custody for four months though he is accused in one more case but he has been granted bail in this case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54371 of 2017 (2) dt.16-11-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Banka in connection with Belhar P.S.Case No.134 of 2014. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T