← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53690/2021bail granted

Chandan Kumar @ Chandrashekhar Kumar @ Chandrashekhar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-12Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53690 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Purnia ====================================================== CHANDAN KUMAR @ CHANDRASHEKHAR KUMAR @ CHANDRASHEKHAR Son of Kesho Mandal Resident of Sakin- Bheemdas tola, Teentenga, P.S.- Ragra Chowk, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-01-2022 Let the defects, as pointed out by the office, be removed within four weeks of starting of Court proceeding in physical mode in normal course.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with C-1 142 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Recovery is of 46 liters of foreign liquor.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. In fact, nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53690 of 2021(2) dt.12-01-2022 2/3 of the petitioner. Although, according to the F.I.R., the alleged recovery is said to have been made from the possession of the petitioner, but the petitioner has sufficiently been punished for the alleged recovery as he has been languishing in judicial custody since 27.08.2021 i.e. more than four months.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the, above named, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Excise), Purnia in connection with CI No. 142 of 2021 with the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53690 of 2021(2) dt.12-01-2022 3/3 to move for cancellation of bail.

And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) braj/- U T