Patna High CourtL.P.A/503/2014withdrawn

Maharana Pratap v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-22Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.503 of 2014 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6333 of 2010 ====================================================== Maharana Pratap Son Of Bhola Prasad Bhagat Resident Of Village- Nagar Phulkiya, P.S.- Ghoga, Distt.- Bhagalpur .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, East Champaran, Bhagalpur

4. The District Superintendent Of Education, Bhagalpur

5. The Officer On Special Duty the Bihar Education Project, DisttBhagalpur

6. The Block Development Officer, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur

7. The Mukhiya, Ghoga Panchayat, Distt.- Bhagalpur

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Ghoga Panchayat, Distt.- Bhagalpur

9. Head Master, New Primary School Fulkiya Pnnychak, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur

10. Prem Lata Devi W/O Kaushal R/O Vill. Adarsh Nagar, Fulkiya, P.S. Ghoga, Distt.- Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Bindhyachal Singh with Mr. Satya Prakash, Advocates For the State :

Mr. M. N. H. Khan, SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) 22-08-2016 Learned counsel for the appellant wishes to withdraw not only the present appeal but also the Writ Petition No. 6333 of 2010 with liberty to avail the remedy against the order dated 11.12.2009 passed by the learned Single Bench in C.W.J.C. No. 5020 of 2008, as may be available to the appellant, in accordance with law.

Patna High Court LPA No.503 of 2014 (3) dt.22-08-2016 2/2 In view of the said prayer, the present Letters Patent Appeal and the Writ Petition No. 6333 of 2010 is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the appellant to invoke such other alternative remedy as is available to the appellant in accordance with law.

However, the grant of liberty shall not be construed as any expression of opinion on the merits of the claim. As and when the appellant invokes the alternative remedy before the appropriate forum, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

(Hemant Gupta, J) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar/Anjani U