Patna High CourtCWJC/25217/2013disposed

Dr. Ramji Prasad Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-04-22Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.25217 of 2013 (2) dt.22-04-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.25217 of 2013 ====================================================== Dr. Ramji Prasad Choudhary S/o Late Ram Ratan Choudhary resident of Village+ P.O+ P.S- Mahnar, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary Department of Nagar Vikash Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Commissioner North Bihar Pramandal, Muzaffarpur.

4. The District Magistrate, Vaishali At Hajipur.

5. The Deputy Secretary Department of Planning and Development, Bihar, Patna.

6. The Joint Secretary Cabinet Secretariat and Co- Ordination Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

7. The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Vaishali at Hajipur.

8. The Executive Engineer Division, B. P.R.D.A., Patna.

9. Smt. Asha Devi W/o Sahdeo Sah Chairman, Nagar Panchayat Mahnar, Vaishali at Hajipur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh, GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 22-04-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Counsel for the State and Nagar Parishad are present. I have perused the records.

The petitioner is aggrieved by resolution dated 23.3.2013 of the Nagar Parishad Panchayat, Mahnar in the District of Vaishali whereunder Proposal No. 11 they have approved the site for construction of the building of Nagar Panchayat office. A counter affidavit has been filed by the Executive

Patna High Court CWJC No.25217 of 2013 (2) dt.22-04-2016 Officer and who in paragraph-7 has stated that the land so donated by the respondent no. 9 who is also the Chairman of the Nagar Panchayat was found more suitable than the other option. It is stated that it is in such circumstances that a resolution was passed which suffers from no infirmity.

Considering the nature of grievance raised and the answer on record, no cause for indulgence is made out. The writ petition is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U