Rumaish Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55103 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2020 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rumaish Mansoori, Son of Ali Mahmad, Resident of Village- Mahuawa, P.S. Chiraiya, District East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chiraiya P. S. Case No.80 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Section 304(B)/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 23.03.2021, he is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that the daughter was married to the son of the petitioner about 08 years back. For sometimes, the relationship was good, but later the petitioner and his family members started demanding Rs. Two lacs, a motorcycle, gold chain etc. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55103 of 2021(2) dt.21-02-2022 2/3 is further alleged that for non-fulfilment of the demand, the deceased was assaulted. On 06.03.2021, the informant got information that his daughter has been admitted in a serious condition at hospital at Bahuarwa. Accordingly, the informant reached the hospital and saw the deceased in serious condition and was referred to Motihari, but on account of serious condition, the victim died on the way to Motihari. Accordingly, it is alleged that accused persons including the petitioner for non-fulfilment of the dowry demand assaulted brutally and killed the deceased.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated. The marriage was 08 years old and in between 08 years, no case came to be instituted by the informant or the deceased against the petitioner or his family members. It is further submitted that petitioner is the father-in-law of the deceased and is separate in mess and property from the husband of the deceased and the husband of the deceased is in custody.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, he is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55103 of 2021(2) dt.21-02-2022 3/3 submitted in the case and is the father-in-law of the deceased, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IV, Sikrahan Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Chiraiya P. S. Case No.80 of 2020.

The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T