Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45209/2025rejected

Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-11Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45209 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2025 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Son of Umesh Paswan Resident of Village - Purkhopatti, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ugranath Mallik, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in a case in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, the informant, who is Sub Inspector of Police, posted at Bahadurpur PS on 14.01.2025 went on night patrolling and while reaching at Chatti Chowk, she saw three persons were coming on a motorcycle and while seeing the police party they were trying to flee away from there but they were being caught with the help of police officials and after searching 82 bottles of Onrex cough

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45209 of 2025(3) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 syrup each containing 100ml kept whose quantity was 8.2 litres were recovered from three white colour polythene from the possession of the petitioner and other co-accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a second attempt for prayer for regular bail before this Court earlier prayer for regular bail of this petitioner were rejected by this Court vide order dated 05.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 25621 of 2025. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2025.

5. On perusal of records, and taking account the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, it appears that there is no fresh ground for considering the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Hence, prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected once again.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T