Patna High CourtCWJC/10315/2013dismissed

Anand Prakash Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-11-08Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10315 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Anand Prakash Agarwal Son Of Prof. Dr. Dwarka Das Agarwal Resident Of Lalbag Colony, Tilkamanjhi, Bhagalpur 1, Bihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna

2. The Director, Directorate Of Employment And Training, Labour Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat Bailey Road, Patna

3. The Deputy Director , Directorate Of Employment And Training, Labour Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna

4. The Principal, Institute Of Industrial Training, Gandhi Chowk, Banka .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vivek Prasad, GP.7 Mr. S.K. Sarat, AC to GP7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present writ petition, petitioner has prayed for disposal of representation in pursuance of order passed in C.W.J.C. No.1453 of 2012.

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.4 annexing memo no. 62 dated 7.4.2012 by which the Principal of the I.I.T, Gandhi Chowk, Banka has rejected the representation of the petitioner much earlier even before filing of the writ petition. But as per the petitioner the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10315 of 2013 (4) dt.08-11-2016 aforesaid order was never communicated to him. However, in view of the prayer made in the writ petition and action taken by the Principal, I.T.I., Banka this writ petition does not survive.

Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed.

However, petitioner, if so advised, may take legal course as available in law.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U