← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66630/2018dismissed

Maniram Das v. The State Of Bihar

2019-02-22Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66630 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2017 Thana- MATIHANI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Maniram Das, Son of Chand Singh/Chela of Tribhuvan Das, Resident of Village-Bahdarpur Thakurbari, P.S. Muffasil, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the Opposite Party:

APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-02-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 448, 307, 326, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act registered in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 197 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated as both the parties are Mahanths vying for supremacy. It appears that a civil dispute is also going on in Title Suit No. 70 of 2006 at the instance of the informant. There is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned APP, on the other hand, opposes the anticipatory bail petition on the basis of the case diary, submitting that the injury report corroborates the accusation of firing by the petitioner and co-accused Chunchun Singh, as the informant has received fire-arm injury on the back and thigh.

4. Having regard to the nature of accusations and gravity

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66630 of 2018(3) dt.22-02-2019 2/2 of offence alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed. (Vikash Jain, J) BT/Chandran U T