Suresh Hembram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43774 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2019 Thana- DHAMDAHA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

Suresh Hembram (M) aged about 40 years, Son of Late Gopal Hembram 2.

Sanjay Hembram (M), aged about 40 years, Son of Late Chopan Hembram 3.

Mangal Hembram (M) aged about 45 years, Son of Late Chopan Hembram 4.

Baijnath Hembram @ Baidhanath Hembrem @ Baidyanath Hembram (M), aged about 45 years, son of Late Naiki Hembram 5.

Tallu Hembram @ Talu Hembram @ Tallu Hmbram, (M), aged about 25 years, Son of Baijnath Hembram @ Baidyanath Hembram 6.

Parmanand Maraiya (M), aged about 40 years, Son of Late Saidu Hembram All are resident of Sakhuwa Tola, Police Station- Dhamdaha, District-Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhanshu Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 77 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 353, 323, 307, 332, 333, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution story, the police, on receipt of information that some persons have obstructed the traffic near College Chauk, reached there and make request but, no body

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43774 of 2019(2) dt.16-07-2019 2/3 was ready to clear the traffic. They became furious and made attack on the policy party. An allegation has been made that the accused persons including petitioners and 70-75 unknown male and female attacked on Bipin Kumar and caused him injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation made against them rather general and omnibus allegation has been made. He further submits that the second case, which has been mentioned in paragraph no.3 of the present petition, is related to the same incident. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Dhamdaha P.S. Case No. 77 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioners for investigation/interrogation, they will remain present and if they would not present themselves, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43774 of 2019(2) dt.16-07-2019 3/3 deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T