Purusottam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58857 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -503 Year- 2017 Thana -DANAPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Purusottam, son of Late Awadh Bihari Prasad, aged about 34 years, R/o Quarter No- 3128, Sector- 4 F, Bokaro Steel City, P.S.- Sector- 4, Town & District- Bokaro (Jharkhand), At present residing at Lal Kothi, Danapur Cantt., P.S. Danapur, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate Mr. Ram Kumar Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant : Mr. Roshan Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the informant is also present.

The petitioner, who is the husband, is an accused in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No.503 of 2017 registered under Sections 304B of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the girl was suffering from depression.

However, Annexure 2 clearly shows that the depression has been caused on account of marital discord. In view of the aforementioned facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58857 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 circumstances, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner. It is, accordingly, rejected.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T