Rinku Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53200 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2017 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ====================================================== Rinku Bhuiyan son of Basant Bhuiyan, resident of village Kusa Tola Chakla, P.S. Dobhi Sherghati, District Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrigendra Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sherghati Dobhi P.S. Case No. 200 of 2017 dated 18.04.2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 15, 17(c), 18(c), 25, 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

The case of the informant is that on confidential information that some illegal Afim and Doda is being kept at Man Punjabi Dhaba, a raiding party was constituted and a raid was conducted at the aforesaid Dhaba and upon search 4.5 Kg Afim and 3 Kg. dry Doda flower kept in a jute bag as well as 13 kg. Doda powder kept in a plastic bag were recovered. From the said Dhaba, its owner namely one Gurdeep Singh and the petitioner as well as one other were also arrested.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53200 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 the petitioner has a clean antecedent, he was just a visitor of the said Dhawa and he has got no role to the said incident. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Gaya in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 200 of 2017. It is made clear that grant of bail to the petitioner may not be construed as an expression of any opinion on the merits of the case as far as the other accused persons are concerned.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U T