Ranjit Sah @ Ranjeet Kumar Sah @ Ranjit Sao v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44346 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2022 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.
Ranjit Sah @ Ranjeet Kumar Sah @ Ranjit Sao, Son Of Late Ramswaropp Sao Resident Of Village- Laraura, Ps- Cheria Bariyarpur, Distt- Begusaai 2.
Mithu Sah @ Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Sao, Son Of Late Ramswaropp Sao Resident Of Village- Laraura, Ps- Cheria Bariyarpur, Distt- Begusarai 3.
Saheb Sah @ Saheb Kumar Sah @ Saheb Sao, Son Of Late Ramswaropp Sao Resident Of Village- Laraura, Ps- Cheria Bariyarpur, Distt- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and alleges that his son in-law informed him that his brothers have killed his daughter by strangulating for getting her share of property.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44346 of 2023(2) dt.24-08-2023 2/3 next submitted that it absolutely does not stand to reason that as to how the petitioners would have benefited by killing the deceased, who is daughter of the informant and wife of their own brother. The learned counsel further submits that it appears that the husband of the deceased through his father in-law got his own brothers implicated in the murder of his wife, so that he can coerce them into submission for parting with the property. It is next submitted that the informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence and if what has been alleged in the F.I.R. is true, then it absolutely does not stand to reason that as to why the husband of the deceased did not institute an F.I.R. at the first instance.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil (Singhaul) P.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44346 of 2023(2) dt.24-08-2023 3/3 S. Case No.296 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T