Gopal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 55112 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -576 Year- 2016 Thana -LAHERIASARAI District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Gopal Mahto, Son of Fakira Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- Bakarganj, P.S.- Laherisarai, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Jitendra Narain Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr Ram Priya Saran Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State.

The petitioner is accused in Laheriasarai Police Station Case No 576 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 447, 504, 506/34 of Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant and the petitioner are neighbours and that in connection with the possession of land intervening the two proprieties, there has been a case and counter case as a result of which petitioner has been implicated in this case. Out of the same transaction, he has also sustained injuries in respect of which he relies on Annexure 2. The other co-accused Kanhai Mahto @ Kanhaiya Mahto has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55112 of 2017 (2) dt.12-12-2017 2/2 already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 18.10.2017 passed in Cr Misc No 50573 of 2017. Investigation in the case is complete and there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

Considering the aforesaid submission, prayer for bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Laheriasarai, Darbhanga in Laheriasarai Police Station Case No 576 of 2016 subject to the following conditions :

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U T