Patna High CourtCR. MISC./51217/2016rejected

Dharmendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-14Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51217 of 2016 (3) dt.14-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51217 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -334 Year- 2015 Thana -BARBIGHA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Dharmendra Yadav, Son of Kishori Yadav @ Deeplal Yadav @ Deeplal Prasad Resident of Village- Laxmipur, P.S.- Barbigha (Kewati), DistrictSheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Barbigha (Kewati) P.S. Case No. 334 of 2015 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(A), 452 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Sheikhpura.

The accusation is that when the informant went in the field to attend the call of nature then Fulo Yadav came there and started to outrage her modesty but anyhow she saved herself, came at her house raising alarm. Thereafter, petitioner and one Birendra Yadav armed with lathi and danda entered in her house

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51217 of 2016 (3) dt.14-02-2017 whereas Fulo Yadav came with sward. In the meantime, Fulo Yadav gave sward blow at the head of informant whereas this petitioner and Birendra Yadav also caused injury to the informant through fist, slaps and Danda.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T