Alok Kumar Shrivastava v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43856 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2019 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

ALOK KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA Son of Uma Kant Shrivastava Resident of Village-Khurmabad, P.S.-Chenari, District-Rohtas. 2.

Mukesh Kr. Shrivastava Son of Narendra Prasad Srivastava Resident of Village-Khurmabad, P.S.-Chenari, District-Rohtas. 3.

Shri Ram Pal Son of Sri Kishun Pal Resident of Village-Khurmabad, P.S.- Chenari, District-Rohtas.

4.

Akhilesh Kumar Son of Santan Sah Resident of Village-Khurmabad, P.S.- Chenari, District-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2019 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 188, 353, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 9 of Loud Speaker Act. Prosecution case is that during procession for immersion of idol the petitioners and others were playing DJ and even no permission was given for the procession. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is no specific allegation of assault or damage of property against the petitioners and they undertake to abide by

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43856 of 2019(2) dt.17-07-2019 2/2 the law in future and they have no criminal antecedent. Heard learned APP also.

In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Chenari P.S. Case No. 44 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T