Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Gop @ Futal @ Futal Gop v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44733 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2020 Thana- KARAI PARSURAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Gop @ Futal @ Futal Gop Son of Valvir Gop Resident of village - Sandh Bigha, Police Station - Karai Parsurai, District - Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Prasad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Karai Parsurai P.S. Case No. 55 of 2020 for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 307/34 of the IPC lodged on 07.05.2020 by the informant.
3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other accused persons started digging a ditch in the field of the informant and when the informant prevented them to do so, they assaulted the informant and one of the FIR accused persons, namely, Makku Gope shot fire which hit the head of the informant and he became unconscious. Accordingly, the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44733 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 allegation against this petitioner is false and frivolous as this petitioner is working as O.T. Assistant at Sadar Hospital, Kodarma, Jharkhand and at the time of incident, the petitioner was discharging his duties, which fact was examined by the Investigating Officer and accordingly, final form in respect of this petitioner was submitted. It is the case of the petitioner that differing with the said police report, cognizance has been taken merely on the basis of the nature of injuries and as also the restatement of the informant.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the fact that the plea of alibi which has been examined and final form is submitted and this petitioner being the Government servant in the State of Jharkhand, this Court is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Richa Rani, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hilsa, Nalanda/Court concerned in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44733 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 connection with aforesaid PS Case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS as well as the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his/their bail bonds.
(Ajit Kumar, J) perwez U T