← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20034/2013dismissed

Subash Chandra Lal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-06Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 20034 of 2013 ======================================================

1. SUBHASH CHANDRA LAL SON OF SRI SHYAM BIHARI LAL RESIDENT OF MOHALLA - LAXMISAGAR, POLICE STATION - L.N.M.U., DARBHANGA, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA

2. OM SHANKAR YADAV SON OF LATE RAJGIR YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - CHHAPAKI PARARI, P.S. - DARBHANGA SADAR, DISTRICT - DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Director, Animal Husbandry, Government Of Bihar, Patna

3. The Regional Director, Animal Husbandry, Darbhanga

4. The Deputy Director, Animal Husbandry, Darbhanga

5. The Assistant Director, Animal Development Project, Biraul, Darbhanga

6. The District Veterinary Officer, Darbhanga

7. The District Magistrate, Darbhanga ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

M/s Suraj Nr Yadav & Ranjit Kr Yadav, Advocates For the Respondent/s :

Mr Krishna Kant Tiwari, AC to SC XXVII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the respondent-State.

2 The writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioners' claim for regularization in light of the Resolution of the Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department dated 16.03.2006.

3 Petitioners, admittedly, have been disengaged as far back as in the year, 1990 itself. Respondents have filed specific

Patna High Court CWJC No.20034 of 2013 dt.06-10-2018 2/2 counter affidavit saying that they do not fulfill the requisite qualification under the scheme of regularization and they are not entitled to any consideration.

4 The averments made in the counter affidavit have not been denied or disputed by filing any rejoinder. 5 The writ petition is devoid of merit and the same is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06.10.2018 Transmission Date NA