Tarakant Prasad ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12942 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Tarakant Prasad Son of Late Satyanarayan Prasad, resident of village- Samani, P.S. Jalai (Mhishi), District- Saharsa

2. Amar Kumar Gupta, Son of Shiv Prasad Gupta resident of village- Samani, P.S. Jalai (Mhishi), District- Saharsa

3. Ram Udagar Mahto, Son of Late Jugat Mahto, resident of Village- Belhi, P.S.- Baheri, District- Darbhanga

4. Dipak Kumar Tudu son of Late Sukhdeo Tudu, resident of village- Jotali Santha Tola, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Saharsa

5. Guriya Kumari wife of Chandan Kumar Sah, resident of villageSamani, P.S. Jalai (Mhishi), District- Saharsa

6. Nosrat Khatoon wife of Aftb Alam, resident of villageKanakhan, P.S.- Jalai (Mahishi), District- Saharsa

7. Santosh Kumar Son of Gajendra Prasad resident of villageSamani, P.S. Jalai (Mhishi), District- Saharsa

8. Sharvan Kumar son of Srikant Sah, resident of village- Samani, P.S. Jalai (Mhishi), District- Saharsa

9. Manoj Kumar Nirala, Son of Ganendra Prasad, resident of village- Samani, P.S. Jalai (Mhishi), District- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Saharsa

3. The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Saharsa

4. District Education Officer, Saharsa

5. The Block Development Officer, Mahishi Saharsa

6. The District Treasury Officer, Saharsa

7. The Block Education Officer, Mahishi, Saharsa ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Aag2- D.K.Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court CWJC No.12942 of 2014(2) dt.31-07-2018 2/2 31-07-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the course of pendency of this writ petition the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and as such this writ petition has become infractuous.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as having become infractuous.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) banti/-T.Kr.

U T