← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13293/2014disposed

Babita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13293 of 2014 ====================================================== Babita Kumari W/O Sanjay Kumar Thakur Resident of village - Taiyabpur, P.O. - Taiyabpur, Block - Deshri, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Director, Department of Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, New Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Secretary, The District Teacher's Employment Appellate Authority, Vaishali at Hajipur.

5. The District Magistrate, Vaishali.

6. The District Education Officer, Vaishali.

7. The District Superintendent of Education, Vaishali.

8. The Block Development Officer, Deshri Block under Vaishali District .

9. The Block Education Extension Officer, Deshri Block, Vaishali District.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhikhanpura, Block - Deshri, District - Vaishali.

11. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhikhanpura, Block - Deshri, District - Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rewati Kant, AC to SC 11.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The grievance of the petitioner is for payment of salary.

3. On behalf of the respondents submission has been made that payment of salary has been made vide memo no. 2653 dated 4.8.2018.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13293 of 2014 dt.06-08-2018 2/2

4. In view of the above, the petitioner does not press the present writ petition.

5. Let the memo no. 2653 dated 4.8.2018 be kept on record which is the document indicating payment made to the petitioner and redressal of the grievance of the petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.08.2018 Transmission Date