Rahul Tiwari @ Akash Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62169 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -237 Year- 2017 Thana -DUMRAUN District- BUXAR ====================================================== RAHUL TIWARI @ AKASH TIWARI, Son of Shatrughan Tiwary, Resident of Brahnmpur, P.S - Brahmpur, Dist. Buxar. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satrudhan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Manoj Kumar - 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2018 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dumraun (N.B.) P.S. Case No. 237 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of snatching the bag of informant, which contained two mobile and other documents. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that F.I.R was registered against unknown and he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion and other coaccused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 23.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 237 of 2017 and petitioner has been in custody since 08.09.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts as well as in view of the fact that other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail, let the petitioner above named, be released on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62169 of 2017 (2) dt.11-01-2018 2/2 bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Buxar, in connection with Dumraun (N.B.) P.S. Case No. 237 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T