Anil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43433 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2020 Thana- BATH District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

ANIL KUMAR SINGH Son of Late Kedar Singh @ Late Kedar Nath Singh Resident of Village - Doulatpur, P.s.- Bath, Distt.- Bhagalpur. 2.

Nilesh Kumar @ Nilu Son of Anil Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Doulatpur, P.s.- Bath, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

3.

Akshay Kumar Son of Son of Anl Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Doulatpur, P.s.- Bath, Distt.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the F.I.R., petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant by means of khanti and lathi.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that injuries found upon the victim is simple in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43433 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 nature. He submits that police has filed final form against the petitioner no.2 & 3 but learned court below differ the final form and taken cognizance against the petitioner no.2 & 3 under Section 341, 323, 324, 307, 506 and 34. He further submits that petitioner no.2 & 3 have got one criminal antecedent and petitioner no.1 have got no criminal antecedent as stated in para3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bath P.S. Case No. 22/2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T