Mohan Thakur v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66447 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2018 Thana- SIWAN MUFFASIL District- Siwan ====================================================== Mohan Thakur Son of Vijay Thakur Resident of Village-Bindusar P.S. Siwan Muffasil,Distt.-Siwan ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Rinki Devi Wife of Mohan Thakur Resident of Village-Sajana Makariyar P.S. Mairwa,Distt.-Siwan ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Sahni For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Sufiyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-07-2019 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and the leaned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 170 of 2018, registered under Sections 498(A), 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. The accusation is of torturing of the complainant/O.P. No.2 by her husband and in-laws due to nonfulfillment of demand dowry and removed her from matrimonial house after snatching her personal belongings. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66447 of 2018(6) dt.08-07-2019 2/2 that on the joint prayer of the parties, the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna, but the matter could not be settled. Further submission is that petitioner wants one time settlement and live separate life, but O.P. No.2 is not ready.

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant/O.P. No.2 submits that complainant/O.P. No.2 wants to live with the petitioner as husband and wife, but petitioner is not ready to keep the complainant/O.P. No.2.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T