Patna High CourtMJC/677/2014allowed

Buddha Grih Nirman Sahayog Samiti Ltd., Patna And ANR. v. The Patna Regional Development Authority, Patna And ORS.

2015-04-08Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.677 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9076 of 2004 ======================================================

1. Buddha Grih Nirman Sahayog Samiti Ltd., Through Its Chairman Namely Krishna Ballabh Prasad Singh, Having Its Office At Buddha Colony, Police Station Buddha Colony, Boring Canal Road, Patna-800001.

2. Lok Prakash Singh S/O Late Atmanand Singh Hon. Secretary, Buddha Grih Nirman Sahayog Samiti Ltd. Resident Of Mohalla Buddha Colony, Police Station Buddha Colony, Boring Canal Road, Patna-800001. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The Patna Regional Development Authority, Patna Through Its Vice Chairman.

2. The Vice Chairman, Patna Regional Development Authority, Patna. Both Having Their Office At Mauryalok Complex, Police Station Kotwali, Town And District Patna.

3. The State Of Bihar Through The Collector, Patna.

4. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna.

5. M/S Sarvottam Nirman Pvt. Ltd., Through Its Director, Namely Satish Bahrulia Having Its Office At Ist Floor 'Khusi Vila Apartment', Opposite Bahujan Samaj Party Office, Buddha Colony, Main Road, P.S. Buddha Colony, Town And District Patna.

6. Satrughan Prasad Belani S/O Late Tola Ram

7. Rakesh Belani S/O Late Tola Ram

8. Smt. Kamla Belani W/O Satrughan Prasad Belani

9. Jatin Balani son of Satrughan Prasad Belani, Respondents No. 6 To 8 Are Residents Of Sindhi Colony, Police Station Buddha Colony, Town And District Patna, .... .... O.Ps.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajiv Nayan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anil Kr Uapdhyay, SC 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 08-04-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioners and the State are present. However, no one appears on behalf of the private opposite parties. .

This application has been filed for restoration of C.W.J.C. No. 9076 of 2004 which stood dismissed for want of

Patna High Court MJC No.677 of 2014 (3) dt.08-04-2015 prosecution on 16.12.2011.

On being satisfied with the reasons mentioned in this application explaining omission on the part of the petitioners, the same is allowed and C.W.J.C. No. 9076 of 2004 is restored to its original file and number.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U