Patna High CourtCWJC/4486/2015disposed

Binod Kumar Ishwar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-02Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4486 of 2015 ====================================================== Binod Kumar Ishwar Son of Late Janardan Ishwar, resident of VillageSiwri, P.s. - Manjhaul O.P. (Cheriya Bariyarpur), District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar Patna.

2. The Commissioner,Munger, District Munger.

3. The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

4. The Land Reforms Deputy Commissioner, Manjhaul, District- Begusarai.

5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Manjhaul, District- Begusarai.

6. The Block Development officer, Nowkothi, District- Begusarai.

7. The Circle Officer, Circle- Nawkothi, district- Begusarai.

8. Ram Nandan Ishwar, son of Late Rameshwar Ishwar, resident of Village- Siwri, P.s. - Manjhaul O.P. (Cheriya Bariyarpur), DistrictBegusarai.

9. Narendra Singh @ Kari Singh, Son of late Ram Ratan Singh, Resident of village Dih, P.S. Birpur, District Begusarai .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Nakul Kumar Jamuar, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K. Sinha, G.P. 15 For Respondent no. 8 : Mr. Karandeep Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 02-12-2015 As prayed, learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead one Narendra Singh @ Kari Singh as respondent no. 9, who was also one of the petitioners in Cr. Revision No. 411 of 2014 which was filed against the order dated 19.8.2014 passed by the S.D.J.M., Manjhaul, Begusarai in Case No. 346M/2014, in course of the day.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the respondent no. 8.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4486 of 2015 (3) dt.02-12-2015 2/2 In view of limited prayer made at the time of hearing, this writ application is being disposed of, without going into the merit of the case, with a direction to the S.D.J.M. concerned to finally conclude the concerned proceeding in accordance with law within a period of two months after granting reasonable opportunity as per the provisions contained in Section 133 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U