Rajnish Kumar v. North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.112 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Rajnish Kumar son of Sri Mohan Prasad resident of Mohalla - and P.O. - Mejarganj, District - Sitamarhi.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. North Bihar Power Distribution Company Limited, Patna.
2. Managing Director, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd., Patna.
3. Chief Engineer, North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. Patna.
4. Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Sitamarhi.
5. Electrical Executive Engineer, Electric Supply Division, Sitamarhi.
6. Assistant Electrical Engineer, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Bairganie, District - Sitamarhi.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 09-02-2016 The grievance in this writ petition, made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, is misconceived inasmuch as it challenges the sort of bills which, according to the petitioner, at many times not correctly raised.
Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, learned Counsel, appearing for North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. In view of the above, this writ petition is sought to be
Patna High Court CWJC No.112 of 2016 (3) dt.09-02-2016 2/2 withdrawn with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future.
No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) (Hemant Gupta, J.) Mkr./- U