Ram Binod Singh And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1031 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -580 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CSAE DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Ram Binod Singh Son of Late Ram Ratan Singh

2. Pramod Singh Son of Late Ram Ratan Singh Both residents of Village - Sonapurdih, P.S. - Nayagaon, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Umashankar Jha Son of Late Ram Kishun Jha resident of village + P.S. - Nayagaon, District - Begusarai.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tarun Pd.Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 12-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of dispute between the parties, let the petitioners above named, who have fair antecedents, be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order in connection with Complaint case No.580C of 2015 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, subject to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1031 of 2016 (2) dt.12-01-2016 2/2 conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.

The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.