Narad Yadav @ Narendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42411 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2016 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Narad Yadav @ Narendra Yadav S/o- Late Subhuk Yadav Village- Paura PSGogri District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Mahant Chhamabant Goswami, Chela of Late Sadhu Sharan Goswami Permanent R/o Village-Makwa, P.S.- Asarganj, Munger, Present R/o Shishwanni Paura, P.S.- Paura(Gogri), Khagaria ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP For the informant :

Mr. Rana Veer, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2.

This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Gogari P.S. Case No.22 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under sections 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

It is alleged that the petitioner has got a saledeed executed in favour of his wife from an impersonator who claiming to be the authorized person to sale the land of the math. The petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2024. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a civil dispute between the parties and considering the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42411 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 period of custody of the petitioner, this Court may enlarge him on bail.

5.

Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail by submitting that it is not a civil dispute but it is a clear case of cheating and forgery. The petitioner has got the land transferred belonging to the math in the name of his wife fraudulently. The petitioner is the beneficiary and therefore, he cannot escape from his liability. 6.

Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

7.

Learned counsel for the informant has undertaken to produce the witnesses in the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T