← Library
Patna High Court/4106/2021bail rejected

Vicky @ Shahbaj v. The State Of Bihar

2021-03-18Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4106 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2020 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== VICKY @ SHAHBAJ SON OF LATE MAHMAD CHAND RESIDENT OF VILL- MARWARI MOHALLA, P.S.- GOPALGANJ, DISTRICTGOPALGANJ ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashish Giri For the Informant : Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 139 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner is alleged to have given repeated knife blow on the back of deceased. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in fact, petitioner and his family lent some money to the informant for purchasing land in the village and the informant did not want to return money and due to which, the petitioner has been falsely implicated. The occurrence is said to have taken place outside

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4106 of 2021(2) dt.18-03-2021 2/2 the hospital, but no witness has come to support the same. There is no evidence direct or circumstantial against this petitioner which shows his complicity in the aforesaid crime. Petitioner is a young boy aged about 22 years and the sole earning member of the family and he is in custody since 08.03.2020 having no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP however, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that petitioner is one of the assailants and there is specific allegation of giving repeated knife blow on the back of deceased causing his death. Considering the facts aforesaid, nature and gravity of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T