Kashinath Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43416 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2021 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

KASHINATH SINGH SON OF LATE RAM PRASAD SINGH R/O VILLAGE- DURGADIH, P.S.- BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS 2.

ASHOK SINGH @ ASHOK KUMAR SON OF KASHINATH SINGH R/O VILLAGE- DURGADIH, P.S.- BIKRAMGANJ, DISTRICT- ROHTAS ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mithilesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 325, 323, 341, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons armed with lathi, rod, bat etc. reached in the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and his family members.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43416 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that petitioner no.1 have got two criminal antecedents and petitioner no.2 have got one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 131/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T