Md Guddu @ Tabarak Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53496 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2019 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul ====================================================== MD GUDDU @ TABARAK HUSSAIN SON OF MD. JAKIR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- TILLITOLA, AMAUNA, P.S.- JOGBANNI, DISTRICTARARIA, STATE-BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sanjida Khatoon Wife Of Md. Rizwan, Daughter Of Md. Jasim Resident Of Village- Mohanpur, Katahara, P.S.- Chhatapur, District-Supaul, State- Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kuldeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 510C of 2019 instituted for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with his family members has tortured in various ways due to nonfulfillment of Rs. One lac as dowry demand and finally they ousted her after snatching her belongings.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is brother-in-law of the informant and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has never

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53496 of 2021(2) dt.06-04-2022 2/2 demanded any thing from the informant. He has no concern with the daily activity of the informant and her husband and is living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband of the informant and not against his family members.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Complaint Case No. 510C of 2019, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Supaul subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U