← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43478/2022allowed

Manish Kumar @ Sintu Singh @ Sintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-29Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43478 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2022 Thana- KHODAWANDPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== MANISH KUMAR @ SINTU SINGH @ SINTU KUMAR Son of Ajay Kumar Singh @ Ajay Singh Resident of Village - Maheshwara, Ward no.6, P.s.- Nawkothi, Distt.- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Randhir Kumar No.1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of 135 litres foreign liquor from Alto car in question and the petitioner was apprehended on spot being the driver of the said Alto car. It is further alleged that 1170 litres foreign liquor was also recovered from pickup van in question.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43478 of 2022(2) dt.29-08-2022 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 25.06.2022 and bears criminal antecedent of three cases in which two is of similar nature. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner is not the owner of the said car and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. It is further submitted that seizure list has not been made as per law. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, after framing of charge on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Excise Judge-I, Begusarai in connection with Khodawandpur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2022, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43478 of 2022(2) dt.29-08-2022 3/3 dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) minu/- U T