Upendra Prasad @ Upendra Pd. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40860 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2019 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== UPENDRA PRASAD @ UPENDRA PD. Son of Jagdish Prasad, Resident of Village- Girwa Tari, P.S.- Sirdalla, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kiran Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 121 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition Excise Act, 2016.

It has been alleged that 9 litres of illegal liquor has been recovered from a dickey of motor cycle.

Looking to the quantity of liquor and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, his prayer for bail is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 2nd

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40860 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 A.D.J.-cum-Special Judge, Nawada in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 121 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. If the petitioner is found involved in similar type of allegation in future, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T