Md. Juber Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44259 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2026 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Juber Alam Son of Md. Manjar Alam Resident of Village- Pama Godaram, P.S.- Basanahi, District- Saharsa (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 309(4), 309(6) and 317(2) of BNS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant has dashed a vehicle due to which, some dent was there on the vehicle. On this, there had been hot altercation between the parties. It is further alleged that the informant offered to pay the compensation for the dent, despite that, the miscreants snatched his mobile, Rs. 10,000/- and also his pickup loaded with cattle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation, one

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44259 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026 2/2 Istekhar Alam has given his confessional statement and he has named this petitioner in his confessional statement. Save and except confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. Actually, it is a case of road rage and the cause of the occurrence is the dashing of the vehicle by the informant which has been given a color of road robbery. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 22.04.2026.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 106 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Supaul. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T