Patna High CourtCWJC/21582/2011disposed

Suresh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-26Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.21582 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21582 of 2011 =========================================================== Suresh Paswan son of Sri Mahendra Paswan, Resident Of Village- Majleshpur, P.O.- Alipur Hatta (Panchayat) Police Station- Mahnar, District- Vaishali At Hajipur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur.

3. The D.D.C. Cum Chief Executive Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur.

4. The Block Development Officer, Mahnar, Vaishali at Hajipur. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, AC to GA-9 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.06.2011 vide Memo No. 741 passed by the respondent no. 4 whereby and whereunder a direction was issued to the petitioner to deposit the amount of remaining rice at the rate of A.P.L. in Block Nazarat.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the Enquiry Commission headed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Udai Sinha (Retired) has now submitted its report and any further action in

Patna High Court CWJC No.21582 of 2011 dt.26-10-2018 relation to recovery of the value of undistributed rice under the SGRY Scheme would abide by the decision of the State Government to be taken on the basis of such report.

4. In the above view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach this Court afresh as and when the occasion arises in future.

5. Having regard to the stand of the petitioner, the writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6. Let the authorities refrain from taking coercive measures against the petitioner until decision is taken by the State Government, as aforesaid.

(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 29.10.2018 Transmission Date N.A.