← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2262/2021disposed

Lovely Ranjana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-17Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2262 of 2021 ====================================================== Lovely Ranjana Kumari, Wife of Pawan Kumar Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Pipra Asali, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 3.

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, West Muzaffarpur. 5.

The District Supply Officer, Muzaffarpur.

6.

The Block Supply Officer, Sahebganj, Muzaffarpur. 7.

Harendra Kumar S/o Late Lakhandeo Rai Resident of Village- Madhuban Suraj, PO.- Balthi Narir, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.Raza Ahmad, AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 17-01-2022 The matter has been taken up for online hearing through video conference because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the District Level Selection Committee for grant of licence to run a fair price shop under Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 [for short BTPDS(Control) Order, 2016].

Patna High Court CWJC No.2262 of 2021(2) dt.17-01-2022 2/2 The District Level Selection Committee, in its meeting held on 09.03.2019, has recommended for grant of licence in favour of respondent No. 7. Petitioner was also an applicant. Admittedly, the petitioner has a remedy under the provisions of BTPDS(Control) Order, 2016, which the petitioner has not invoked.

Considering the facts and circumstances, this application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate/ statutory authority under the BTPDS(Control) Order, 2016. If he makes any representation/ application before the appropriate/ statutory authority within four weeks from today, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and disposed of within a period of two months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) Rajesh/- U