← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41329/2025bail rejected

Sri Ram Kumar @ Sri Ram Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-31Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41329 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2022 Thana- SHEKHPURA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Sri Ram Kumar @ Sri Ram Kumar Yadav S/o Tapeshwar Yadav R/o VillageMangrar, P.S- Lakshmipur, District-Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Ankita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anish Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 31-07-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

3. As per prosecution case, 145 litres illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the car of the petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be owner of the vehicle in question. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41329 of 2025(2) dt.31-07-2025 2/2 vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that huge quantity of liquor was recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner is registered owner.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, fact that huge quantity of illicit liquor was recovered from the vehicle of which this petitioner is registered owner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shikha/- U T